British Thoughts on Babies
"I don't dislike babies, though I think very young ones rather disgusting." ~ Queen Victoria

Why UnBaby.Me Doesn’t Really Work for Me

By now you’ve all heard about the unbaby.me extension for Chrome that automatically replaces photos of babies in your newsfeed with those of cats (or bacon, or Justin Beiber, etc.). If you haven’t, you should consider getting wi-fi for your cave. The day it was released, nearly everyone I’d ever met emailed, texted or Facebooked me about it. At first I found this amusing, but after the tenth person sent it my way, I thought, Good Grief – these people think I’m a real baby-hater!

Believe it or not, I haven’t downloaded unbaby.me and have no plans to do so. Is it because I secretly relish seeing photo after photo of progressive baby bumps, or infants with enough cake smeared on their face to feed a small village in Africa? No. It’s because unbaby.me doesn’t actually solve the problem. Which is that I now know more about the potty training habits of my friends’ kids than I do about my friends themselves.

Here’s the thing: I DO enjoy seeing the occasional photos of my friends’ babies (particularly those who look creepily like their parents). Much in the same way I enjoy seeing snapshots of the first house they just purchased, an impressively decorated cake from one of my culinarily-inclined friends, or an action shot of their latest half-marathon (preferably looking justifiably miserable or on the verge of puking). Because it gives me a glimpse into their life and keeps me connected to the things that are important to them, and that’s what Facebook is good for.

But all too often, when those same cake-baking, marathon-running, house-purchasing friends have a baby, we’re abruptly blacked out of what’s going on with them. Instead we begin receiving all too intimate (and let’s face it, all too boring) details of the life of someone we’ve never met. This…baby. I would never begrudge anyone a wild streak of posting about their baby after it’s born. If the rumors are true, it’s the most exciting thing that’s ever happened them. What bothers me is that for many (not all) of them, the streak never ends; we never get our friends back. The updates move from teething to how hard it is to drop them off at the first day of preschool to complaining about the cost of high school sports equipment.

Some will say those people were never really your friends if Facebook was your only source of staying in touch. And while that may be true, it’s not always easy or practical to keep up with everyone from your past, even if you want to. After high school and then college, my friends and family scattered to the wind. I wound up hundreds or thousands of miles away from everyone I knew, and reading status updates and seeing photos of those that I miss makes me feel like I’m in some small way still part of their lives.

So while I like a good calico wearing a sombrero as much as the next guy, a photo of that replacing my friends’ babies with an update of “Baby removed” isn’t going to give me my friends back. If anything, it’s going to be a prominent reminder that that’s all they’re posting about these days.

A Silver Lining to un.baby me

There’s been (predictably) a bit of outrage amongst the parenting community. One mama writer summed up the prevailing parental reaction with her article, Un.Baby Me? Unfriend Me Instead. And I can’t say I’m surprised. It’s certainly driving a bigger wedge between parents and the Childfree, and it’s human nature to want to go on the offensive when you’re insulted rather than examine whether there’s any truth to the attack. But what if we did take a closer look at what we’re posting on Facebook and how it’s being perceived?

I’m not just talking about parents here. I’m also talking about myself and other sans-kids people who can be just as bad by using Facebook as a place to brag, endlessly blab about one issue, look clever, or shamelessly self-promote things like, ahem, our blogs. It’s really a selfish little business when you get down to it. But I wonder what our newsfeeds would look like if we all thought a little more about what we were sharing? If we focused on putting out thoughtful, funny or interesting comments from the many different aspects of our lives?

Before you post yet another baby-related update, political meme, photo of your boring lunch, or whatever else you’ve been obsessively and singularly sharing, consider shaking things up. Why not share a joke, publically compliment a friend out of the blue, or ask a thought-provoking question like Why, WHY have we not, as a society, come up with a less-disgusting name for “lady fingers”? Maybe we can get back to what Facebook used to do best: starting dialogues, making people laugh, and allowing us to share a little bit of our lives with the people who haven’t yet become so annoyed with us that they’ve blocked our updates.

16 Responses to Why UnBaby.Me Doesn’t Really Work for Me

  • Megan M says:

    To be fair, it’s not just the childfree who might get tired of the onslaught of baby pictures in their feeds. Other parents could just as easily get heartily sick of seeing it, if they’re the kind of parent who realizes that their own life consists of more than just their baby’s poop habits. So, it really should be driving a wedge between the “oh my god my kid is the greatest thing that ever happened to humankind!!!” parents and the rest of us. Most of my FB friends are parents, and I’ve only hidden one of them for this type of behavior. And she wasn’t even posting pictures, but rather daily updates about how special and unique and ahead of the curve and kind and intelligent and clever and good-looking and just all around perfect her two boys are. It sounds like I’m exaggerating, but I’m really not. It was amazing.

    • Maybe Lady
      Maybe Lady says:

      That’s an excellent point because you’re definitely right – there’s a huge difference between those types of parents and the ones who probably think all of those things but would never publicize those thoughts.

  • neal says:

    I’ve got to confess, I promote my blog on facebook too. I think people might want to replace those posts with pictures of cats.

    I infrequently post pictures of her mostly because I spend every.stinking.day pondering things to do with her, thinking of ways to entertain her, educate her, discipline her… she drives me crazy and occasionally makes me very proud.

    But I get what you’re saying. There are more dimensions to a person than just their kids. I’m kind of a recluse, and rarely try to get together with other people. My wife, however, likes company, but gets really tired of getting together with moms that only want to talk about their kids and poop and breastfeeding, instead of philosophy and prison reform and works by Tony Morrison. But do you really think Facebook WAS ever good for those things? Once upon a time, there were fewer pictures, and fewer parents involved with it, since it was simply a college phenomenon. But it pretty much started as a tool for stalking and for hooking up, as far as I know. It always seemed a little superficial to me.

    • Maybe Lady
      Maybe Lady says:

      Well, it’s certainly always had its problems. But the baby thing didn’t really take over until very recently for me, mainly because most of my friends didn’t have kids until the last couple of years. unbaby.me was just a good reminder to pay closer attention to what we’re putting out there – maybe there’s still hope for Facebook to at least partially go back to the more useful site it was to me a few years ago. But, maybe not…

      • neal says:

        I’ve been tempted recently to join communities like Reddit (which I’m only just learning about) where people seem to REALLY discuss tough, interesting stuff, although I suppose it might be a little more global/less intimate in a few ways.

        • Maybe Lady
          Maybe Lady says:

          The Reddit community is very active and very vocal – I’m sure you’ll find it quite an experience! I really enjoy the comments from the Childfree Reddit group on there.

        • MisChef says:

          YES reddit is awesome. especially /r/childfree , which I’ve linked to via my name, above.

          Weacceptyou! Oneofus! Weacceptyou! Oneofus!

  • totesmcgoats says:

    you could really shake things up and use that camera/facebookstatusupdater in your pocket as a phone and call your freinds to ask how they are doing! I am not sure it is rational for anyone to suugest what others should share. As long as facebook provides the opportunity to give us the power to say what we are feeling, parents are going to feel their kids. That is what shapes their identity right now and clearly what is most important. As time moves on, that will evolve. Facebook really is a public forum to push information out, not a forum for pulling what you want from others.

  • Serious_about_Smoothies says:

    Oh I have never heard of that! I installed it and it’s kind of annoying because it does not always work. But I changed the filters to substitute every image tagged with vegan – vegetarian – healthy – organic – keywords. And have them replaced with greasy pizza. That annoys me way more than The Early Childhood Development Chronicles.

    • Maybe Lady
      Maybe Lady says:

      Haha! The possibilities are endless. And now you’ve made me want pizza for dinner, thanks.

  • Stephanie says:

    I was actually thinking about this application last night and I got to thinking – why are so many “anti-baby” apps and websites popping up now? People have always had kids and have probably always pulled away from their childfree friends, so why is it so much more prominent now? After some thought I realized that this is the very first wave of social media folks to have kids. The college kids who got on Facebook when Mark Zuckerberg FIRST invented it, we’re all in our 30′s now and our friends are having kids and oversharing on Facebook. This has, in fact, never happened before in history. As annoying as it is, it’s interesting when you think about it that way.

    I haven’t installed un.baby me mostly because I do like to see SOME baby updates, just not most of them. Really, I should just hide or unfriend those people who I don’t want to see, or at least turn off their photos.

    • Maybe Lady
      Maybe Lady says:

      You’re absolutely right – I think it’s going to be really interesting to see what unfolds in terms of the dialogue between parents and the Childfree because this really is the first time there’s going to be an enormous online discussion between the two groups. It’s one of the reasons I love doing this blog, it’s fun to be a part of it.

  • Diva says:

    I decided a long time ago that I was going to post whatever I wanted on my FB page (within my scope of privacy, that is). Anyone who objected to its content is welcome to hide, skip or de-friend me. And I do the same to posts I don’t like! :)

    That being said, I think that seeing a lot of family posts can be uncomfortable because it brings up feelings I am still grappling with — the loss of a friend who has moved on to another stage of life without me, my own ambivalence about having kids, my envy and comparison of their life to mine, my anxiety that perhaps I will miss out and regret not embarking on this life-changing experience. While I don’t believe the loss is permanent, we just aren’t going to have the same friendship. So it is an adjustment and it can be hard.

    For me, FB has become a good exercise in paying attention to these feelings, whether they are regarding a friend’s new house or new baby. I have to look at what is my envy/anxiety/sadness telling me and what do I need to do, if anything? It might be as simple as replacing posts with kitty pics (I love the kitties), but for me I tend to think the better solution is to reach out to that friend that I are missing. Even if it’s an online FB chat at midnight! :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>